![]() For example, a reporter could collect the basic who, why, where, when, and what information for a news story as a series of notes, as they’ve always done. Most news reporters I know are more concerned with how AI might affect writing and editing. I’m more than casually familiar with what’s going on in the news business, and although it’s changed, the public has an incomplete picture of those changes and what’s driving them. Today, for example, I have a conference call scheduled with a CNN editor about a writers’ workshop in which he’ll be participating and that I’ve been hired to help promote. Remember, I spent 15 years in journalism, my wife spent 20 years at another metro newspaper, and most of my friends are still writers, reporters, and editors. The legitimate news outlets I’m familiar with would fire a reporter who deliberately faked a photo and passed it off as the real thing. In addition, lower profit margins have resulted in staff cutbacks and a decline in fact-checking, like mistaking steam from a smokestack as smoke. However, not every news outlet is FOX or its equivalents on the other end of the spectrum or supermarket tabloids. It’s become much more competitive, and individual news media outlets report what their specific audience segments want to read. I agree that news journalism has changed in many ways. Journalistic integrity has been going down the tubes for years already. Now that these sites have millions of images and continue to grow by leaps and bounds, people are increasingly finding the images they upload lost in the crowd. When the stock sites contained a few thousand images, making a bit of money from adding photos was easy. However, if I need actual imagery of people backpacking in the Grand Canyon, no AI tool will give me that authentic photo or video, no matter how good it gets.Ī greater immediate threat, in my opinion, to the value of uploading imagery to stock sites is the competition. With enough messing around, Midjourney can generate one that will probably work. Suppose I need a generic fantasy/sci-fi illustration incorporating a face. This will likely change down the road, but currently, tools such as Midjourney aren’t really up to the task. I think you might also be overestimating the quality of AI images generated from scratch. I think you might also be overestimating the ease of creating an AI image instead of finding one on a stock service. It’s a great photo, but I need it to look like fall instead of summer, and I need someone fishing in the lake, so I use Firefly to do this. ![]() For example, I might buy an image of a mountain lake scene on Shutterstock. In addition, from what I understand, designers will be able to load into Photoshop their own photos, illustrations, and stock photos they’ve obtained from various sources. I read they plan to integrate it into some of their already-existing software, such as Photoshop and Illustrator.Īdobe plans to compensate photographers and illustrators as images get used from Adobe’s stock platform as part of the AI generative process. Adobe says it will only learn from open-source, copyright-free, or Adobe-licensed images. Take Flyfly, Adobe’s new generative image creation tool that’s in beta testing. I am really confused, what do you think will be the future of stock images and videos? You could alter the image and make it ready - and how would they know if it was AI-generated or not?Ĭould you take a style of some icons and ask AI to generate more versions in a similar style - fine tune them and upload? Have you considered using it yourself to generate assets for stock sites? Once more as an imaginative tool like any software. I think AI is here and we need to embrace it. Here we fall into untrained eyes scenario - where the person creating an AI image might go - hey this looks really good.īut working with an artist or with a designer gives the opportunity for feedback and improvement and more detailed experience. ![]() With AI you might be able to get a 90% type of image created that you think looks good - but it requires that extra. I don’t have to spend hours constructing graphics when it’s already done for me.įinding similar style graphics for a publication is a challenge and there’s a huge advantage to finding a style that suits and everyone agrees on which makes it easy to use for publications. One of the advantages I find for stock sites is finding similar style images or charts/graphs/infographics for use of quicking interchanging the data.įor example, I might find a particular style of graph to be interesting and I then search for your name and other graphs you might produce and use those and interchange the data.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |